
Your reading a pre 2010-11 archived article
You would think as a Leeds fan I would be pleased to see this piece of intellectual ruminating that appeared in this morning’s Daily Mirror: http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/opinion/columnists/stan-collymore/To-make-the-Premier-League-the-best-get-Leeds-and-Newcastle-back-get-rid-of-small-clubs-and-scrap-relegation-and-promotion-article201025.html well you’d be wrong, very wrong.
Rather die than be promoted by stealth.
Lets gloss over, mainly for the benefit of sanity the reality that Stan Collymore’s place in history will be more related to the use of his fists in Paris and his knob on turn 7 than it will be for anything he ever did on the pitch or that he competes with Ian Wright for the “summariser with no idea” award, as they are not really germane here, the advocate of the ideas contained within the article could have come from the most respected of hero’s and it would still be dangerous rubbish. That a national newspaper pays Collymore money to produce this stuff only adds to the growing feeling of a game going slowly off its rocker!
Now I may attract a lot of flak off me own for this but I can’t think of anything worse for Leeds United to be arbitrarily promoted, at the expense of financially better run (and in reputational as well), football managed better and recent track record successful clubs. I can’t think of anything that would be worse in getting the shyster Bates out or cutting off at the legs Grayson’s possible potential and just as importantly can you imagine the extent of the glory hunting we would attract with that kind of fast track? No just in terms of my club, bollox to that.
Having tasted so much pain since 2002 I’m dammed if we are going to be denied the glory and pleasures of EARNED promotion simply to satisfy an idiotic concept.
Definition of a “big club”!
The article goes on about “bigger” and “smaller” clubs as if that definition can be applied rationally, big town, must be a big club, except in Bristol of course, small town, small support small club except Premier League winning/League Cup winning Blackburn Rovers. What tosh, it is one of the glories of our national game that the fortunes of clubs ebb and flow regardless of “size”, the best example of this is Newcastle United, a club Collymore would also fast track into his no relegation PL. How do the Toons quality as a big club other than none footballing related factors? Well it isn’t success, last trophy in 1969, 40 years ago! It certainly isn’t how they are run, the irony of the Ashley reign is that it is just the dessert to the Sheppard years.
Now I may attract a lot of flak from the barcodes for this but one Fairs Cup in my lifetime (47th season of) does not “big” club make. Within that time-span St James Park used to “rock” to crowds of all of 15k, the only reason it has the overblown ground it does now is due to the Keegan years coinciding with the explosion of monies within the PL (something which itself has meant a distorted competition both with the lucky 20 and the full 92). Even the small coal town down the road and the smoggy mess from the next estuary down have had more success than Newcastle since 1969. If you’re going down the road of franchise operations in PL football the only chance the Toons have of being the representatives of the North East is to merge with their two rivals and relocate to Hartlepool Marina (hang on I think I just gave Ashley an idea).
Tradition, investment, even a passion for the game, have no meaning unless the club claiming them have and CONTINUE to earn the accolade’s be it “big club” or not.
Death by franchise.
To be fair to Collymore he isn’t the first to spout this idiocy, Phil Gartside has being trying to flog a variant of this for the last few years (irony alert, Bolton would probably be classed as a small club by Collymore as would Bradford City, Leicester City and as likely as not twice European Cup winning Nottingham Forest, clubs Collymore was happy to ply his trade at!) including Rangers and Celtic. The prime motivation for all this is monopoly, greedy clubs with greedy chairman trying to prevent others getting a piece of the action. This greed gets distorted into ideas about banning promotion and relegation and consequently becomes just another version of the franchise concept. Is it a coincidence these type of idiocies are happening as American ownership of PL clubs explodes? No I don’t think so either given the moribund state of their so called big 5 sports!
Now I may attract a lot of flak from the glory hunters supporting PL clubs for this but any top division experience since the late 90’s is an inferior product to the more competitive nature of the other 3 divisions and 72 clubs. How any supporters, be they Arsenal, Manchester United, Liverpool, Bolton, Fulham or Wigan can stomach playing the same teams for the same positions year in year out I know not. Everyone of those clubs has a history where they had to overcome adversity and /or relegation, each of them knows success doesn’t come without the long road of preparation and ladder climbing. To even want a closed shop in theory is the thinking of the selfish and deluded. Don’t give me all that “investment” crap, life can be unfair sometimes but nothing is more unfair than monopoly.
Twenty years ago you could be confident that all supporters would hound an idea like Collymore’s out of town with super speed, not today, the innate selfishness of the glory seeking supporter would see to that. That reality however shouldn’t stop all right thinking fans, from all clubs, including those that might benefit from idiocy, to just stand up and shout NO!



